By following the report, it has been said that Failed gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams, who famously refused to concede her election, has been making a name as a “voting rights” activist, particularly in the State of Georgia.
On the other hand, Democrats far and wide credited Abrams with Biden’s win in Georgia, as well as the special election victories of Jon Ossify and Raphael Warnock. But how could a red state go so blue so quickly, specifically when all the other southern states went for Trump?
Abrams, who runs a shadowy GOTV group called Fair Fight, recently discussed the Georgia integrity law that made general fake outrage from Democrats and voting rights groups. “What do you think the impact of those laws could be when you look ahead specifically to the midterm elections?” PBS host Amna Nawaz urged Abrams. “Are you concerned that Democrats could lose control of the House and Senate as a result of those?”
“Yes. As a partisan, I am concerned about whether my party, which tends to be over-representative of communities of color, of communities that are disadvantaged and marginalized, that the party to which I pledge allegiance, or at least I have given my fealty, that the party could lose.
She stated. “But I honestly want us to return to the fundamentals of voting.” she also said, “In a nation like the U.S., with its changing demography, if the response to increased participation by communities of color, by young people, by women, if the response is to restrict their access and impede their participation, that is a very, very strong signal that we are heading in the wrong direction and that our democracy is not safe, it is not sound, and it is not resilient,”.
In a sense, they are right: They are “restrictions” against acting fraud in U.S. elections. Abrams and the partisan media that denies to challenge her, proceed to repeat this non-sensical talking point that measures to ensure one citizen has one vote are “restrictions” on “access” to the election.